Is Oklahoma a ‘Backwards’ State?

Legislative sessions in Oklahoma are usually rife with contention, last-minute budget deals and unconventional bills and this year has certainly been no exception.  With this year’s budget still being a huge question mark, cuts are already happening and many departments have already begun trimming staff.  Medicaid, the earned income tax credit  and education funding are issues making the news, along with non-budgetary items including abortions and school restrooms.  Yes, restrooms.

Put it all together with a few other things and it’s apparently enough that some have labeled Oklahoma a ‘backwards’ state.  A national laughingstock. An embarrassment.  I have probably seen more negative articles and comments about Oklahoma and our legislature this year than any other.  Articles such as the one titled “Oklahoma Continues Marching Backwards Into the 1950’s With New Laws.” One column I saw shared frequently was from Ginnie Graham of the Tulsa World, who said, “Oklahoma sure had one embarrassing week.”  It was pretty clear from her column that her politics are liberal and her disdain for the legislature reflected that.  She railed not only about the budget situation but also an abortion bill, the “Great Bathroom Debate of 2016” as she put it, and other things that aren’t related to the legislature.

“After days like these, there’s a need for contemplation, a bit of anger and a lot of action. If this isn’t the tipping point, it must be near. Oklahoma has to do better than what our elected lawmakers are giving us.”

Oklahoma has to do better.  That’s an attitude expressed by many lately.  But better in what respect?  Better at the budget?  Better at not cutting whatever pet issue the complainer cares about? Better at ignoring issues that many do care about, such as abortion and the restroom issue?

OK BudgetThere’s no debating the fact that the state budget is in trouble this year.  With the budget shortfall being more than $1 billion, cuts are unavoidable. The question is, what gets cut? No matter what gets cut, people will complain.  Education gets cut; people complain. Social services get cut; people complain.  Staffing gets cut; people lose their jobs, including some of the people with whom I’ve worked for years.  I doubt you could find anyone connected to the budget process, from those who create it to those who are affected by it, who are happy with the current situation.

What seems to be riling people the most is that some of the legislators have the temerity to propose legislation dealing with social issues while work on the budget is proceeding.  Why, the nerve!  I wish I had a dollar for every person who has said that legislators have no right to propose any legislation until the budget is “fixed.”  What that really means is they don’t like the legislation being proposed.  This year is certainly no different.

Senator Nathan Dahm submitted SB1552, which would have made it a felony for a person to perform or induce an abortion.  Any person doing so would have faced between one and three years in the state penitentiary.  Of course, this bill was quickly labeled an outrage by those who see nothing wrong with abortion. Senator Dahm said he had hoped the bill would eventually end up at the Supreme Court and result in Roe v. Wade being overturned.  That’s not going to happen now since Governor Fallin vetoed the bill, saying some of the language was “too vague.”

Another proposal receiving scorn was Senate Concurrent Resolution 43, which takes on the so-called “bathroom issue.”  SCR43 is a direct response to the U.S. Department of Education telling schools that federal law requires them to allow students to use the restrooms and locker rooms “consistent with their gender identity” and that receipt of federal funding for schools would be in jeopardy for noncompliance.  SCR43 condemns the action by the DOE, directs the Oklahoma Attorney General to defend Oklahomans against this federal overreach and requests that Oklahoma’s representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives file articles of impeachment against President Obama and the Secretary of Education, among others.

Naturally, SCR43 was met with outrage similar to that levied against Senator Dahm’s abortion bill.  Even in a year with no budget woes, these bills would have been met with scorn and derision. In addition to SCR43, SB1619 was proposed and would allow for religious accommodations to be requested by students who don’t wish to share a bathroom or locker room with students of the opposite sex. SB1619 was passed by a joint committee and can now be considered by the full Senate.  I was surprised to see Senator David Holt comment on the floor of the Senate that he was “ashamed” that so much time had been spent on the restroom issue, rather than focusing on the budget.  Senator Holt is an advocate for budget-only sessions every other year.

The budget, abortion, bathrooms, earned income tax credit, Medicaid, education… The totality of issues and unexpected legislation during this session has served Oklahoma’s detractors well, giving them ample targets for their scorn.

Is any of it justified?  Is Oklahoma really a ‘backwards’ state?

Is it backwards to want to protect the unborn from being ripped limb from limb?  Is it backwards to continue to try to get the travesty known as Roe v. Wade overturned?  Is it backwards to try everything possible to find a piece of legislation that can put a stop to butchering babies? Believing that abortion should continue to be legal is certainly one’s right.  But it is also one’s right to continue electing principled people such as Senator Dahm, who will do more than just sit idly by while the carnage continues.  Senator Dahm’s bill was vetoed by Governor Fallin so it will not have the result he hoped for, but it did expose the governor for her lack of commitment to being pro-life.

Is it backwards to want to protect our state’s children from mentally ill, gender-confused people?  Those of you with daughters, do you really want your daughter to be sharing a locker room and restroom with a boy who lets his hair grow out and claims he’s a girl?  I’m sure those of you who are liberals think that’s just fine, but to conservatives here in Oklahoma, such a thing would be one of the best arguments I’ve seen in a long time for homeschooling.

Is it backwards for a state legislature to push back against the executive branch of the federal government when it exceeds its authority with demands given to local schools?  Ask Obama if his daughters are sharing restrooms with boys at the private school they attend.

Is it backwards to cut spending when there’s no money?  Is it backwards to cut education funding when there’s no money?  Is it backwards to cut spending on social services when there’s no money?  Sure, everyone screams bloody murder about how horrible the consequences will be without their particular issue being fully funded, but when there’s no money, there’s no money.

Is it backwards to cut the earned income tax credit?  Local television station KFOR described the EITC as a credit that “gives money back to the poorest Oklahomans who don’t make enough to even pay taxes.”  Gives money back.  How do you give money back to someone who doesn’t pay income taxes in the first place?  The EITC is nothing but a redistribution of income.  

Is it backwards to slash government spending when there is no money?  I know that to most liberals and even some so-called conservatives, the answer is to raise taxes.  Utter nonsense. That’s always the liberal response when they think the government needs more money.  Just take it from the people and never mind the fact that government might be wasting money.  It’s hard to take liberals seriously on budget problems when they refuse to even discuss consolidation of school districts.  Government bloat is fine with liberals as long as it’s their bloat.  

So to sum up, if stopping abortion, protecting students from the mentally ill, pushing back against the feds and cutting spending is what people consider to be ‘backwards’ then I suppose yes, Oklahoma is a backwards state and I hope and pray it continues to be so.  I sincerely hope the day never comes when liberals, baby killers, transgender supporters and tax proponents have nothing to complain about in Oklahoma.  So all you lefties out there, please, keep calling Oklahoma ‘backwards’ and ‘an embarrassment.’  It’s music to my ears.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrDigg thisEmail this to someonePrint this page

8 comments to Is Oklahoma a ‘Backwards’ State?

  • Trent England

    Great points. My friend Byron Schlomach also just crunched some top-line taxing and spending numbers that show Oklahoma is not at the bottom of any of the big government spending categories. It does, in my opinion, raise questions about whether we get all the government we pay for, especially in the area of transportation. It’s the top item here: http://www.1889institute.org/fiscal-policy.html

  • Al Gerhart

    Do you have a recent article on Lucas? I found one a few years old but we are needing something recent for a series of magazines we are dropping in that congressional district. Looks like the Brown woman is a much better choice.

    • I have not written about Lucas in quite some time.

      • Al Gerhart

        Not a lot out there on him and we focus mostly on state politics so I am going to use your arguments as a starting point if you don’t mind. We will hit around 20 thousand voters before the primary in that district and we need something on Lucas that might help his opponent.

        Thanks

        Al

        • My posts are free for anyone to use but I would appreciate attribution.

          • Al Gerhart

            I can do that, sort of. I can talk about your story and the points you made but the majority of the story will come from other sources including sources covering the opponent. The story itself is too old to re print although I wish I could, well written story.

            • What magazine are you referring to? What publication is this that might have something I wrote included?

              • Al Gerhart

                The Oklahoma Guardian, my group the Sooner Tea Party puts them out during election years. Started out as a web press newspaper, ten thousand copies per district that we targeted but that proved too expensive so this cycle we are printing and delivering copies in five targeted House Districts but only to the primary voters. Like I said, we are not using your article, it was written back in 2013 but we are researching to see if the points you made are still true about Lucas and if so we will use your points as a starting point for our article.